Seemingly soft on the outside, sharp as razor blades if you mess with him.
Raskin quickly gained control, denying him the satisfaction. "That's not okay with you guys, because you wanna politicize-" struggled Gaetz, trying again to get his right-wing media soundbite out, and failing. "You don't wanna know," Raskin rightly concluded. If the United States government brings charges, people can resolve those in the courts." Gaetz pretended to have respect for the courts, answering, "We have a process in Article III, where the courts get to determine those issues. He continued, "Okay, lemme ask you about that." You don't wanna know any more," interjected Raskin. That the focus on January 6th is unwarranted -" Gaetz began, "For many of the reasons that I've discussed today. Why did you vote against that commission?" he asked. I think you voted against that commission. Jerry Nadler of New York additionally tweeted: is a wonderful father, a selfless public servant and an American hero in every sense of the word. Matt Gaetz should strive to be even half of the patriot and kindhearted human being that Mr. So he turned against it, and then the Republican leadership flipped over and turned against it. consultant for Raskin didn’t straight away reply to Insider’s request for remark. And yet, Donald Trump decided he didn't like it because he doesn't want anybody investigating January the 6th. "The chairman of the January 6th Committee, Chairman Thompson and John Katko, who was the emissary of Kevin McCarthy, negotiated an agreement for an independent outside commission with five Democrats, five Republicans, equal subpoena power, right down the middle. I've got some serious questions to ask you," because clearly Gaetz wasn't capable of discussing Trump's sixty-plus failed court cases with any degree of seriousness. The beloved Maryland rep continued, "I'm sorry, Mr. You know what? That might work on Steve Bannon's podcast, but that's not gonna work in the Rules Committee in the United States House of Representatives," he informed Gaetz, who had clearly been hoping for a Fox or Newsmax moment. Gaetz whined, "How can they decide there's no fraud if they didn't take up the question and review the facts on jurisdiction or remedy?" He repeated, perhaps because he knows he's dealing with a stunted intellect in Gaetz, "There's no violation. Raskin, his voice dripping with well-deserved condescension as he drew out and elongated the "Mr. "No court has said fraud existed, so there's no remedy, because there's no violation, Mr. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), who is a constitutional law professor. A viral video of Gaetz’s appearance as a witness before the Rules Committee of the House on Wednesday cast him in a decidedly poor light, especially opposite Rep. Gaetz: The country shouldn’t have to go through all that with him. Jamie Raskin as being unable to do his job due to losing his own child to suicide. Still, during the hearing, Raskin tried to catch Gaetz off-guard by trying to get him to admit that President Joe Biden really won the 2020 election.Arguing that all of Trump's lawsuits attempting to overturn 2020's election have failed for good reason, Raskin - a constitutional law professor - had the legal and intellectual advantage over the Florida alleged sex trafficker Gaetz. Gaetz’s usual attention-grabbing antics in Congress wound up backfiring on him as well. In a particularly low move, Matt Gaetz attacked January 6th committee member Rep. Although the committee voted to hold Bannon in contempt Tuesday night, the House will vote on the matter on Thursday. TIRED OF THE ADS? BECOME A PREMIUM USER TODAY!!Īt the hearing, Gaetz was meant to be opposing the holding of Steve Bannon in contempt for disobeying a subpoena for documents surrounding the investigation into January 6th. Although the Democrats want to believe the Capitol Hill riot was the start of a civil war, Gaetz blatantly stated, “You have no other legislation or other solutions for the country. On Wednesday, at a House Rules Committee hearing, Representative Matt Gaetz didn’t mix words when he got into a heated debate with Democratic Representative Jamie Raskin. While the rest of America has moved past the events on January 6th, especially given the numbers of riots held by Black Lives Matter, the Democrats are determined to hold top GOP members accountable, including former President Donald Trump.
0 kommentar(er)
